RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00986
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His AF Form 910, Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) (AB thru
TSgt) section V, Overall Performance Assessment rendered for the
period 30 Jan 12 thru 29 Jan 13, be changed from an overall
rating of 3 to 4.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His EPR markings on the front (Above Average/Clearly Exceeds) do
not correlate to the overall rating (Average) he received on the
back.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
AF Form 910.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSID recommends denial. The applicant has not provided
sufficient, substantiating documentation or evidence to prove
his assertions that the contested report was rendered unfairly
or unjustly, and has merely offered his view of events as he
believes them to be true.
The applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation
Report Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of AFI 36-2406,
Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, dated 3 Jan 13, due to
his separation from active duty.
The applicant may believe an error or injustice has occurred;
however, the markings do not directly translate to the overall
rating on the evaluation, but rather reflects the performance
assessment of the member. The applicant has provided no
evidence to show that the EPR was inaccurate or unjust and,
therefore, the EPR is accurate as written. Furthermore, a final
review of the contested evaluation was accomplished by the
additional rater and a subsequent agreement by the
reviewer/commander served as a final check and balance in
order to ensure the report was given fair consideration in
accordance with the established intent of the current Officer
and Enlisted Evaluation System in place.
The applicant has failed to provide a re-accomplished EPR, along
with signed memorandums of support/justification from the
original evaluators at the time. AFI 36-2406, states the Board
will not consider nor approve requests to change evaluators
ratings or comments if the evaluator does not support the
change.
Air Force policy is that an evaluation report is accurate as
written when it becomes a matter of record. Additionally, it is
considered to represent the rating chains best judgment at the
time it is rendered. To effectively challenge an evaluation,
it is necessary to hear from all members of the rating chainnot
only for support, but also for clarification/explanation. The
applicant has failed to provide any information or clarification
from all the rating officials on the contested report. Once a
report is accepted for file, only strong evidence to the
contrary warrants correction or removal from an individuals
record
The applicant has not substantiated that the contested report
was not rendered accurately and in good faith by all evaluators
based on knowledge available at the time.
The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 2 Feb 15, for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-00986 in Executive Session on 12 Mar 15, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Mar 14, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPDPSID, dated 6 Nov 14.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 2 Feb 15.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01365
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01365 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her AF Form 911, Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) (MSgt thru CMSgt), rendered for the period 2 Apr 13 through 9 Apr 14 be amended to reflect a senior rater endorsement. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Apr 15, for review and comment...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02279
In accordance with AFI-36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, Table 3.7, Note 6, the close-out date for EPRs is one year from the previous EPR close-out date or when 120 calendar days of supervision have passed. From the time the new rater was assigned until the EPR close-out on 2 Mar 10 there were 124 days of supervision, making the evaluation an accurate report in accordance with AFI 36-2406. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04746
The first time the contested report was used in the promotion process was cycle 11E6. The complete AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 23 Mar 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05449
Her Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) for the period ending 21 Mar 12 be removed from her record. Her EPR for the period ending 2 Feb 13 be removed from her record. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The EPR for the period ending 21 Mar 12 includes a negative comment stating she received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR); however this LOR is not in her Personal Information File (PIF) nor is there any evidence of it in her records.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00061
In support of her requests, the applicant provides copies of her AF Form 910; AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report; DD Form 2870, Authorization for Disclosure of Medical or Dental Information; Standard Forms (SF) 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care; AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, MEB final disposition and other documentation associated with her request. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00827
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his EPRs for periods ending 4 Apr 08 and 13 Jan 09, his appeal to the Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) and, a memorandum from his rater dated 6 May 08. Moreover, while Air Force policy requires formal feedback be documented, a direct correlation between information provided during the feedback session and the assessments on an evaluation report does not necessarily exist. The complete AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00908
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00908 COUNSEL: NONE INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 910, Enlistment Performance Report (EPR) (AB thru TSgt), rendered for the period 5 March 2010 thru 12 April 2011, section III, Fitness Assessment (FA) rating of Does Not Meet be changed to reflect Exempt and the referral status be removed. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04618
The applicant has not provided any evidence within her appeal that this report did in fact not make it into her promotion selection record in time for the promotion evaluation board. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 1 March 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). We took notice of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03198
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application extracted from the applicants military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate Air Force office of primary responsibility (Exhibit B). The applicant has failed to provide any information/support from the rating chain of record on the contested EPR. As a result of this finding, AFPC/DPSIDEP has, in accordance with AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems, administratively corrected the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03691
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03691 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His referral Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) with an overall rating of 2 for the period of 24 May 2012 thru 13 Dec 2012 be removed from his records. She advised him that she would not change the rating and asked him to sign the EPR and the...